CrPC Section 94 — Search of place suspected to contain stolen property, forged documents, etc

CHAPTER VII PROCESSES TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF THINGS

General

Official Text

(1) If a District Magistrate, Sub-divisional Magistrate or Magistrate of the first class, upon information and after such inquiry as he thinks necessary, has reason to believe that any place is used for the deposit or sale of stolen property, or for the deposit, sale or production of any objectionable article to which this section applies, or that any such objectionable article is deposited in any place, he may by warrant authorise any police officer above the rank of a constable—

(a) to enter, with such assistance as may be required, such place,

(b) to search the same in the manner specified in the warrant,

(c) to take possession of any property or article therein found which he reasonably suspects to be stolen property or objectionable article to which this section applies,

(d) to convey such property or article before a Magistrate, or to guard the same on the spot until the offender is taken before a Magistrate, or otherwise to dispose of it in some place of safety,

(e) to take into custody and carry before a Magistrate every person found in such place who appears to have been privy to the deposit, sale or production of any such property or article knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect it to be stolen property or, as the case may be, objectionable article to which this section applies.

(2) The objectionable articles to which this section applies are—

(a) counterfeit coin;

(b) pieces of metal made in contravention of the Metal Tokens Act, 1889 (1 of 1889), or brought into India in contravention of any notification for the time being in force under section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962);

(c) counterfeit currency note; counterfeit stamps;

(d) forged documents;

(e) false seals;

(f) obscene objects referred to in section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860);

(g) instruments or materials used for the production of any of the articles mentioned in clauses

(a) to (f).

Sections referred to

Referred to by

Related Judgments

  • Manoj Mahadev Patil vs Rajan Pandurang Parkar And Anr — Bombay High Court (Mumbai Principal Seat) (2022)
  • M. P. SHARMA AND OTHERS vs SATISH CHANDRA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DELHI, AND OTHERS — Supreme Court of India (1954)
  • V. S. KUTIAN PILLAI vs RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR — Supreme Court of India (1979)
  • ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2875 OF 2023; Shiv Chanduba gupta @ vs The State of Maharashtra — Bombay High Court (Mumbai Principal Seat) (2023)
  • STATE. BY NILRATAN SIRCAR, ENFORCEMENT vs LAF91HMI NARAIN RAM NIWAS — Supreme Court of India (1964)
  • SHYAMLAL MOBANLAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT — Supreme Court of India (1964)

Old <-> New Code Mapping

  • BNSS §97 — Search of place suspected to contain stolen property, forged documents, etc