BNSS Section 260 — Procedure in cases instituted under sub-section (2) of section 222

CHAPTER XIX TRIAL BEFORE A COURT OF SESSION

Criminal

Summary

When a Sessions Court handles a case that was started under a specific provision about false complaints, it must follow the same procedure used for warrant-cases that were not started by a police report. The person who is alleged to have committed the offence must usually be examined as a witness for the prosecution, unless the court decides otherwise for recorded reasons. The trial must be held in private (in camera) if either side asks for it or if the court thinks it is appropriate. If the court discharges or acquits the accused and believes there was no reasonable cause for the accusation, it can order the person who made the false accusation to show cause why they should not pay compensation of up to five thousand rupees to the accused. The court will consider any explanation given, and if satisfied, it may order compensation, which is recovered like a fine. Paying compensation does not protect the person from any other civil or criminal liability, but any amount paid will be considered in a later civil case about the same matter. The person ordered to pay compensation can appeal that order to the High Court, and the compensation is not paid until the appeal time has passed or the appeal is decided.

Official Text

(1) A Court of Session taking cognizance of an offence under sub-section (2) of section 222 shall try the case in accordance with the procedure for the trial of warrant-cases instituted otherwise than on a police report before a Court of Magistrate:

Provided that the person against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed shall, unless the Court of Session, for reasons to be recorded, otherwise directs, be examined as a witness for the prosecution.

(2) Every trial under this section shall be held in camera if either party thereto so desires or if the Court thinks fit so to do.

(3) If, in any such case, the Court discharges or acquits all or any of the accused and is of opinion that there was no reasonable cause for making the accusation against them or any of them, it may, by its order of discharge or acquittal, direct the person against whom the offence was alleged to have been committed (other than the President, the Vice-President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory) to show cause why he should not pay compensation to such accused or to each or any of such accused, when there are more than one.

(4) The Court shall record and consider any cause which may be shown by the person so directed, and if it is satisfied that there was no reasonable cause for making the accusation, it may, for reasons to be recorded, make an order that compensation to such amount not exceeding five thousand rupees, as it may determine, be paid by such person to the accused or to each or any of them.

(5) Compensation awarded under sub-section (4) shall be recovered as if it were a fine imposed by a Magistrate.

(6) No person who has been directed to pay compensation under sub-section (4) shall, by reason of such order, be exempted from any civil or criminal liability in respect of the complaint made under this section:

Provided that any amount paid to an accused person under this section shall be taken into account in awarding compensation to such person in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter.

(7) The person who has been ordered under sub-section (4) to pay compensation may appeal from the order, in so far as it relates to the payment of compensation, to the High Court.

(8) When an order for payment of compensation to an accused person is made, the compensation shall not be paid to him before the period allowed for the presentation of the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal is presented, before the appeal has been decided. A.—Cases instituted on a police report

Related Judgments

  • SC (2024) Vol.7 p.979 — Supreme Court of India (2024)
  • SC (2025) Vol.5 p.730 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.6 p.545 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.2 p.1588 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.3 p.1309 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • .. Petitioner/Accused No.12 vs The State of Tamilnadu, — Madras High Court ()
  • SC (2025) Vol.1 p.1469 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.11 p.291 — Supreme Court of India (2025)

Old <-> New Code Mapping

  • CrPC §237 — Procedure in cases instituted under sub-section (2) of section 222