BNSS Section 259 — Previous conviction

CHAPTER XIX TRIAL BEFORE A COURT OF SESSION

Criminal

Summary

If a person is charged with having a previous conviction under a specific part of the law, and they do not admit to that previous conviction, the Judge can only bring up evidence about that past conviction after the person has been found guilty of the current offence. The Judge must then record a decision on whether the previous conviction is proven. The charge about the previous conviction cannot be read out to the accused, and the prosecution cannot mention it or present evidence about it, until after the accused has been convicted of the current offence.

Official Text

In a case where a previous conviction is charged under the provisions of sub-section (7) of section 234, and the accused does not admit that he has been previously convicted as alleged in the charge, the Judge may, after he has convicted the said accused under section 252 or section 258, take evidence in respect of the alleged previous conviction, and shall record a finding thereon:

Provided that no such charge shall be read out by the Judge nor shall the accused be asked to plead thereto nor shall the previous conviction be referred to by the prosecution or in any evidence adduced by it, unless and until the accused has been convicted under section 252 or section 258.

Related Judgments

  • SC (2025) Vol.5 p.730 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.6 p.545 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2024) Vol.7 p.979 — Supreme Court of India (2024)
  • SC (2025) Vol.2 p.1588 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • .. Petitioner/Accused No.12 vs The State of Tamilnadu, — Madras High Court ()
  • SC (2025) Vol.3 p.1309 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.1 p.1469 — Supreme Court of India (2025)
  • SC (2025) Vol.11 p.291 — Supreme Court of India (2025)

Old <-> New Code Mapping